Recently, the Second Amendment Foundation and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms filed a federal…Read More >
Most Recent Posts
SACRAMENTO, CA — A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Friday that California’s ban…Read More >
UPDATE (4/25/20): The United States Court of Appeals has granted an emergency stay on the injunction, which means we are required…Read More >
Dual bills were introduced by gun control advocates in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate that would…Read More >
The progressive side of the American political debate has declared itself and its policies immune to federal, state, and sometimes…Read More >
Are you aware that several states have laws in place to circumvent your Second, Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights, relating to…Read More >
On Friday, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms and ammunition, joined several other gun rights groups in announcing that it opposes the Assault Weapons Ban of 2019 introduced in the U.S. Senate last week. The legislation introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and signed by a host of other Democrats, like earlier versions, relies on wrongfully defining commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles based on certain cosmetic features.
Everyone has that kitchen drawer. That’s the one where a book of matches, take-out menus, extra cell-phone power cords, pet treats, a pack of gum, and a hammer are kept. That is, of course, if you could only find them under the rest of the junk in there. That’s sort of what our state-by-state landscape looks like when it comes to firearms legislation after this week’s midterm elections. It’s ugly, but if you dig, there’s something worth finding.
If you though the anti-gunners were beat with election of President Trump and one or two nominations to the Supreme Court, think again. The Washington Post has reported that anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety “plans to spend $8 to $10 million in Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and New Mexico” to influence the midterm elections, via its “Action Fund.” And that is not the full extent of expenditures by the gun prohibition group’s fund, either.