“We want a new rifle cartridge that is more effective at neutralizing enemy combatants,” said the United States Army. “Especially ones who are outfitted with modern body armor that our 5.56×45 ammunition has difficulty penetrating. Let’s start a Next Generation Squad Weapon program in 2017. That way multiple defense contractors can propose suitable replacements for our 5.56 M4 carbine and M249 SAW light machine gun!”
That’s more or less what the U.S. Army said. Here is (also more or less) how SIG Sauer responded:
“That sounds great, U.S. Army! Here – check out the XM7 and XM250 we have designed around a novel short-action rifle cartridge of our own design and creation: the 6.8x51mm Common Cartridge, which shall also be referred to as ‘277 SIG Fury!’ We think you will agree it is a massive upgrade over the 5.56. Why, it’s arguably even better than your 7.62x51mm (which is analogous to the commercial 308 Winchester cartridge).”
“Wow,” said the U.S. Army upon witnessing those firearms in action. “Just wow. We love what we’re seeing, SIG. Forget all those other defense contractors. We are adopting your creations!”
But How Does the 277 Fury Shoot?

To be certain, though it may supplant the 5.56, the 277 Fury can hardly be argued to be very similar. It shares a nearly identical length as the 7.62×51, and performs much more similarly to it.
To that end, the 277’s ballistic performance is indisputably better than the 7.62×51’s (and by extension the 308 Win’s). When loaded with bullets of the same weight and style, the 277 invariably exhibits the flatter trajectory, and also conserves higher striking energy at any point downrange. That’s a testament to its maximum loaded pressure of 80,000 psi compared to the 58,000-60,000 psi that 7.62×51 is typically loaded to.
At present, very few types of 277 Fury ammunition are available to the general public (which isn’t helped by the fact that SIG is the only major manufacturer producing it; Lake City Army Ammunition Plant has the potential to change that in a big way). Here are ballistic data for the three 277 cartridges currently listed for sale on SIG’s website.
277 Ballistics Table
Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturer | Product Line | SKU | Bullet | G1 BC | Barrel Length | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 600yds | 700yds | 800yds | 900yds | 1000yds |
SIG Sauer | Elite Ball | E277SFB135-20 | 135gr FMJ | 0.475 | 24" | 3000 | 2800 | 2609 | 2426 | 2251 | 2082 | 1921 | 1768 | 1625 | 1492 | 1371 | 2698 | 2351 | 2041 | 1765 | 1519 | 1300 | 1107 | 938 | 792 | 667 | 563 | -1.5 | 9.2 | 15.4 | 16.5 | 11.7 | -19.7 | -48.9 | -89.2 | -142.7 | -211.8 | |
SIG Sauer | Fury Hunter | H277SFAB150-20 | 150gr AccuBond | 0.5 | 24" | 3000 | 2810 | 2628 | 2453 | 2285 | 2124 | 1969 | 1821 | 1681 | 1551 | 1430 | 2998 | 2630 | 2301 | 2005 | 1740 | 1502 | 1291 | 1105 | 942 | 801 | 681 | -1.5 | 9 | 15.1 | 16.2 | 11.4 | -19.1 | -47.3 | -85.9 | -136.9 | -202.3 | |
SIG Sauer | Hybrid Match | H277SFOTM155-20 | 155gr SMK HPBT | 0.549 | 24" | 3000 | 2827 | 2660 | 2499 | 2344 | 2195 | 2051 | 1912 | 1780 | 1655 | 1537 | 3098 | 2750 | 2436 | 2150 | 1892 | 1658 | 1448 | 1259 | 1091 | 943 | 813 | -1.5 | 8.8 | 14.6 | 15.6 | 11 | -18.2 | -44.7 | -80.7 | -127.7 | -187.4 | |
Scroll right on the table to see velocity, energy and trajectory data.
How Is It Compared to Other Cartridges?

Looking at 277 data alone is illustrative, but doesn’t give you a sense of how much better or worse the new round’s performance is relative to that of other rifle cartridges.
In the interest of perspicacity, we have assembled a chart comparing multiple different cartridges’ ballistics. Note that we selected cartridges loaded with 150 grain AccuBond projectiles; or, barring that, the closest style of bullet we could get to the AccuBond. The exception is the 5.56 round, which represents the M855 performance the 277 is intended to supercede.
Barrel Length | Velocity (fps) | Energy (ft-lbs) | Elevation (in) | |||||||||||||||||||
Cartridge | Manufacturer | Product Line | Bullet | G1 BC | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 300yds | 400yds | 500yds | 0yds | 100yds | 200yds | 400yds | 500yds | |
300 PRC | Copper Creek | - | 150gr AccuBond | 0.435 | 24" | 3450 | 3208 | 2980 | 2763 | 2557 | 2360 | 3965 | 3428 | 2958 | 2544 | 2178 | 1855 | -1.5 | 2.6 | 3.3 | -7.8 | -20.9 |
28 Nosler | Copper Creek | - | 150gr AccuBond | 0.493 | 24" | 3300 | 3093 | 2897 | 2709 | 2528 | 2355 | 3628 | 3187 | 2795 | 2444 | 2130 | 1848 | -1.5 | 2.8 | 3.5 | -8.2 | -21.9 |
300 Win Mag | Winchester | Deer Season XP | 150gr Extreme Point | 0.392 | 24" | 3260 | 3004 | 2763 | 2535 | 2318 | 2111 | 3540 | 3006 | 2544 | 2141 | 1789 | 1485 | -1.5 | 3.1 | 3.8 | -9.3 | -25 |
7mm Rem Mag | Federal Premium | - | 150gr Scirocco | 0.515 | 24" | 3050 | 2863 | 2684 | 2513 | 2347 | 2188 | 3099 | 2731 | 2401 | 2103 | 1835 | 1594 | -1.5 | 3.5 | 4.2 | -9.6 | -25.6 |
277 SIG Fury | SIG Sauer | Fury Hunter | 150gr AccuBond | 0.5 | 24" | 3000 | 2810 | 2628 | 2453 | 2285 | 2124 | 2998 | 2630 | 2301 | 2005 | 1740 | 1502 | -1.5 | 3.6 | 4.4 | -10.1 | -26.9 |
30-06 Springfield | Remington | Premier Scirocco | 150gr Scirocco | 0.435 | 24" | 2910 | 2697 | 2493 | 2299 | 2113 | 1936 | 2821 | 2422 | 2071 | 1760 | 1487 | 1249 | -1.5 | 4.1 | 4.9 | -11.4 | -30.6 |
270 Win | Winchester | Expedition Big Game | 150gr AccuBond LR | 0.591 | 24" | 2900 | 2742 | 2590 | 2443 | 2301 | 2163 | 2802 | 2505 | 2235 | 1988 | 1764 | 1559 | -1.5 | 3.8 | 4.5 | -10.3 | -27.2 |
308 Win | Nosler | Trophy Grade | 150gr AccuBond | 0.439 | 24" | 2875 | 2665 | 2465 | 2274 | 2090 | 1916 | 2753 | 2366 | 2024 | 1722 | 1456 | 1223 | -1.5 | 4.2 | 5 | -11.7 | -31.4 |
7mm-08 Rem | Nosler | Trophy Grade | 150gr AccuBond LR | 0.546 | 24" | 2750 | 2585 | 2426 | 2273 | 2125 | 1983 | 2519 | 2226 | 1961 | 1721 | 1505 | 1310 | -1.5 | 4.5 | 5.2 | -11.9 | -31.5 |
5.56x45mm | PMC | X-TAC Match | 62gr LAP | 0.304 | 20" | 3100 | 2785 | 2491 | 2215 | 1958 | 1720 | 1323 | 1068 | 854 | 676 | 528 | 407 | -1.5 | 3.9 | 4.8 | -11.9 | -32.9 |
300 AAC Blackout | Winchester | Deer Season XP | 150gr Extreme Point | 0.392 | 16" | 1900 | 1717 | 1549 | 1397 | 1264 | 1156 | 1203 | 982 | 799 | 650 | 533 | 445 | -1.5 | 11.8 | 13.2 | -31 | -83.8 |
The data confirm what you may have already suspected:
1. The 277 does not compete with the magnum rifle cartridges that were developed for big game hunters. These dump way more energy into their bullets, and launch them across flatter, harder-hitting trajectories because of it.
2. The 277 does outclass the U.S. Army’s outdated 30-06 Springfield, as it does the 308. It beats out non-magnum hunting cartridges, and absolutely trumps intermediate combat cartridges like the 5.56 and 300 AAC Blackout.
The 277 is still fairly early on in its lifespan. Ammunition is difficult to find, and expensive. Appealing though its ballistic performance might be, the average Joe may have difficulty justifying an investment in the 277.
But as the U.S. Army increasingly utilizes the new cartridge – and more and more Americans become accustomed to its performance as a result – the 277 will quite likely encounter higher demand from the commercial market. When that starts happening, the 277’s ballistic performance is nearly certain to garner a large fanbase.

There are some mistakes in the article I would like to address. The author says that the rifle is not available. That is not correct. The SIG MCX-SPEAR rifle chambered in 6.8×51/277 Fury was released as a special-edition model in January of 2022. After those sold out there was a period of time where they were not available. They became available again in mid-2024 and are still available today.
Here is the 16″ barrel version: https://www.sigsauer.com/mcx-spear-6-8-x-51.html
Here is the 13″ barrel version: https://www.sigsauer.com/mcx-spear-sbr.html
The author says that the 6.8mm bullet diameter is the reason for the ballistic performance of 277 Fury. That is not the primary reason for the performance. The primary reason is that 277 Fury, when loaded to military specs, has a chamber pressure of 80,000 PSI. Compare that to the chamber pressure of 7.62x51NATO which is 50,000-58,000 PSI.
Why not just resurrect the 6.8 SPC?
As any other government agency IT TAKES A LONG TIME TO MAKE A DECISION. I guess until the right pockets get padded. If you remember, if you are old enough, the army had round field caps. When I entered active duty ball caps were issued. I was jokingly told ” someone higher up had a lot of stock in abaseball cap factory. Think about it. If what you are stating in your aricle is factual, why shouldn’t we give our soldiers more effective fire power!!!!!
How does the 277 Fury compare to the 6.8 SPC already being used by some military units? Wouldn’t it have made more sense to utilize the 7mm-08? Same 51mm case, 140 grain bullet, and it outperforms the 7.62 X 51.
Ok, so where is that ballistic data you referenced? Did someone forget to include that?
Groan. Another “new” cartridge that gun writers can spill ink about and is simply tinkering around the edges of existing cartridges. Run down to your favorite sporting goods store and try to buy some .277 Fury ammo and see how that works out for you. Shooting nerds seem to believe that all fire fights are at 1000 yards when in actuality they are at less than 100 yards. And I’m not going to even talk about ammo weight.