Taurus Throws Concealed Carry a “CURVE” With New Introduction

Taurus Curve handgun front black

Could this be the Holy Grail? A concealed carry handgun that is “print-free” as well as comfortable in any position on the body? Taurus is claiming its new CURVE will deliver just that.

Building a firearm with a curved grip frame is no easy task. Reported to be about the size of one of today’s smartphones, the USA-manufactured CURVE is a double-action only, semi-auto pistol, packing 6+1 rounds in a highly concealable 5.18-inch package. Weighing in at 10.2 ounces, the CURVE combines innovation with functionality for close-quarter, personal security confidence. The curved polymer pistol has a carbon steel slide and a stainless steel barrel for increased reliability.

Taurus takes safety seriously and incorporated a loaded chamber indicator as well as integrated the Taurus Security System for long-term locking storage. Taurus also provides a trigger protector that is fast and easy to deploy with a built-in lanyard for use when using the holster-free belt clip.

Another industry-first, an integrated LaserLyte LED light and laser combo system built within the frame makes for efficient target acquisition during most lighting scenarios. On the rear of the slide and designed for instinctual point shooting at close distances, is the bore axis sighting system. This subcompact handgun does not feature traditional sights to keep the concealed carry design smooth and snag-free. The textured grip and the low bore axis of this pistol deliver comfortable shooting and mild recoil.

Wearing the CURVE every day provides the peace of mind needed for protecting yourself and your family in these uncertain times. Have the CURVE on your side—it’s the gun you wear!

Taurus Curve, MSRP $392
Caliber .380 ACP
Action Double-action only (DAO)
Trigger Pull 5-7 pounds
Barrel 2.5 inches long, stainless steel
Slide Carbon steel; matte blue finish
Overall Length 5.18 inches
Overall Height 3.7 inches
Overall Width 1.18 inches (0.88-inch grip)
Weight 10.2 ounces, unloaded
Sights N/A
Lights/Laser Integrated LaserLyte system
Grip Polymer with metallic subframe
Capacity 6+1 rounds
Safety Devices Loaded chamber indicator; Taurus Security system
Accessories Trigger protector; integrate side belt clip holster

Cheaper Than Dirt! has managed to secure one of the first models from production. Once the coin toss and subsequent wrestling matches are finished and a winner chosen, we will head to range for a full report. Stay tuned to the Chronicle newsletter for a first look!

What are your thoughts on the Curve? Is it the Holy Grail to end printing or something else? Give us your early impressions in the comment section.

The Mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!'s blog, The Shooter's Log, is to provide information—not opinions—to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!

Comments (124)

  1. Had a Taurus “slim 40” for a while. Not long, sold it before it completely tore up my finger and was not very accurate. Don’t believe I’ll buy another Taurus, even a bent one.

  2. I have had two Taurus semi autos pt24-7 40 and the 9mm. Both went bang until about the 700 round mark then the mag would drop out of the gun while firing. Embarrassing to say the least. I was not hitting the mag release after closely watching. And they weren’t very accurate. Even after send back for servicing it was hard to depend on them, both got sold. I have also read articles where the 45 Pro had the same issue. My father has two revolvers and they have been OK as well aside from a loosening cylinder. I want to like Taurus especially the 745 but my experience says stay away.

  3. it appears the shooter is slapping the trigger, like most Taurus’s does this gun also have a long, hard, ruff, trigger pull? If so, I’m not sure I would recommend it. Most shooters like a smooth even trigger not something that is so difficult it takes everything you have to shoot the gun….

  4. The curve seems like a good idea regardless of who makes it. It is purely to be a concealed weapon with its size and design……………….UNLESS YOU ARE LEFT HANDED!

    1. So Taurus, what are you doing about the left handed issue? I’ve had to deal with this for most things in my life and have adapted well, but I can’t say that I’d want to “adapt” to something as critical as a personal firearm.

      I can recall the very first time in my experience that a lefty was actually accommodated was with a Garcia Mitchell spinning reel (the 411 version of the right handed 410). They actually did offer a dedicated left handed model. Today most, if not all reels have the function to switch built into the base reel unit.

      Taurus, what are you going to do?

  5. My dad has 4 Taurus guns (one is my current carry gun) and only one has ever had issues, but it was fixed with some ramp polishing. I like the new design but I have a few issues/questions that keep me from buying one immediately:
    Will it be manufactured in 9mm?
    How durable/intuitive is the flashlight/laser?
    How do the sights feel? (I’ve looked and can’t find a pic)
    Hows the grip, it looks small?

  6. Brian,

    I know that quite a few people tend to make disparaging remarks about Taurus guns. Like you, I have two. The first was a gift from my brother-in-law (see why I like him?) and I purchased the second. It has been my experience that I tend to deal with several different gun shops or dealers. While my personal experience with Taurus has been just fine, I note that when I decided to purchase a new Taurus, I checked at 5 different dealers. What was unique about that purchase experience was that each and every dealer tried to talk me out of purchasing the Taurus. Each told the same story — that they had more dissatisfied customers from Taurus than any other manufacturer. As I say, my personal experience has been fine but the dealers all tried to dissuade me. One of the dealers I know well and we have been friends for years. I don’t think he would deliberately mislead me and he seemed genuinely concerned about my purchasing a Taurus. I did anyway and it has been just fine.

    1. MacII, well said. What many of these bandwagoners don’t know is that Taurus’s factory is a Beretta factory using machines Beretta used to make it’s weapons. I don’t own a Taurus, but I have friends who do. They clean it regularly and they’ve never had a single issue. It seems that 90% of the people commenting literally know nothing about weapons. I have seen too many of them leave comments. From caliber-divas to noobs who don’t understand the purpose of a CC. These are the idiots who leave their weapons out and raise kids like Adam Lanza. Taurus isn’t high point, heck even high point weapons work decent.

    2. I love guac,

      Thank you for the comments. One of my Taurus is a bit loose but remarkably accurate. It is like an old 1911 — shake it and listen to it rattle. But load it and shoot it and it is remarkable.
      It is an early model and looks like a small Sig. Functions like the Sig and is one of the most accurate guns I own. It is not like my Wilson, but then it did not cost over $3,000 either. And, you would not ever want to bet your life on the difference between that Taurus and my Wilson. The difference is so small, you would lose.
      I have well more than 1,000 rounds through the Taurus (could be several thousand, I just did not count) and it does tend to come up dirty and even leaves a few smudges on my hand from time to time, depending on the ammo. Still, it has never jammed and has digested premium and the cheapest ammo I could buy at times. It is very dependable and supremely accurate.

    3. I side with the dealers. sent my Taurus back twice. 1st time barrel replaced faulty ramp jamming issues, second time rear sights off they were replaced. turn around time is over a month. this was new out of box never again.

    4. Mark,

      Two dealers told me that Taurus had more returns than any other manufacturer. I know both dealers fairly well and think they are straight shooters. But, my personal experience has been different.

  7. way to go taurus the gun will sell, people will buy it , it will be comforable to wear and will there be other cals.avalible? I have two taurus guns and they are very reliable to shoot .

  8. And he spends his free time (which is a lot) at the gun shop bothering the sales people and customers with all his “supposed” gun knowledge.

  9. Hey guys REALLY??? I wrote in on a comments thing a while back and there was this INANE bickering going on then also? WHO CARES! We are commenting on a firearm PERIOD, I dont think anybody insulted somebodies Mom here, we are all entitled to our opinions and ideas, and none of us are right all the time!!! I must say that if the time comes when I attempt to make a comment on this site again and I run into this extreme level on NONSENSE it will be my last!!!

  10. I like the idea of somebody trying to come up with something new. Maybe it won’t work, but I don’t want people to stop trying. Personally, I kind of like the idea. Regarding caliber, I certainly would rather see it in 9mm, but I don’t think I would like getting shot with a .380 very much, even in the foot. Also, regarding the grip and change of how you hold it, they still make and sell derringers. You don’t hold them the same way either. I think I’ll buy one. If it does turn out to be a good idea, hurrah, I have one. If not, well they won’t sell many and I’ll have a rare gun that not many people own, hurrah. I win either way. And I bet that if they do sell these, lefties won’t be far behind.

    1. As an addition, I’ve never really gotten the whole idea of a laser, especially in a gun like this. If I’m pulling a gun like this, I’m gonna be close, real close. I am not going to take the time to turn on a laser or light, or try to make sure the little red dot is where I want it. I’m gonna be close enough that I’m drawing, pointing and firing.

  11. My concern is the LaserLyte built-in laser. I’ve bought two LaserLyte lasers in the past and neither worked right. I sent both back and received replacements, and neither of them worked properly, either. I gave up and won’t buy anything else from them, so I am really skeptical of how well the laser (or the light, for that matter) will work on the Curve. Since the gun has no sights, the laser has got to work and be dependable.

  12. Could Dude be any more insulting or narrow-minded? I don’t think so. I’m also a leftie, and all 1,000 of us are all “weirdos”? What happened to being respectful of others? I agree that we lefties live in a right-handed world, but Charles Bentley’s question is still a valid one. I bet if this catches on, Taurus at some point will make a version for southpaws.

    1. Have you read 95% of the comments on this article. It’s people bitching like little girls before they have even tested the product themselves. They sound like a bunch of liberals constantly complaining. A company has taken a chance with something new and innovative. And all many of these weirdos do is gripe. These are the same tools who think 1911s are still the greatest probably. They make the 2A community look like a bunch of backwoods idiots. Taurus is taking a chance and by the looks of the product it looks more comfortable. All of us gun enthusiasts aren’t the white trash type you see opening carrying. Or the idiots who think they’re conceal carrying their G26 but you can still perfectly see it bulging out. This Curve is a product that you can wear with a tucked in dress shirt and slacks and not notice a thing.
      And to all the idiots talking about 380s, it’s about shot placement, not caliber. Me shooting a .22lr is more dangerous than any of these commenters with a 45. No wonder why anti-gunners hate the 2A community so much. They whine like babies when a gun company tries to give them something NEW that can be concealed BETTER.

    2. Dude,

      I understand you’re upset, I am a bit too but take it easy on Charles, his question was valid and he wasn’t whining.

      It’s always better to be patient and gentle with all people when at all possible. I think all of us here are on the same side and we need each other so we should keep our emotions in check brother.

      Just my opinion,

    3. Dude,
      I can see that your “issues” are not about Charle’s simple question but you obviously have a problem with “95%” of the people that comment on this site. If you have that much of an issue then I am sure that the 95% would be just as happy as I would be if you would take your comments somewhere else. They have been uncalled for, unnecessary and completely out of line.

    4. Unfortunately I must wholeheartedly agree with you.

      Regarding this new Taurus product, I like innovation. I think this looks like an interesting firearm. I will probably buy one!

    5. Like conservatives don’t bitch and moan about everything under the sun. Which is what your doing with your post.

      Not my kind of size pistol and at the rage this pistol is for you don’t need the added complexity.

    6. Yo, man. I love my 1911 (used to it now at 70+ yrs of age and 50+ yrs of use). Tho I do think it’s the greatest (for me), I know it’s not the greatest for everyone. However, I do like the idea of the little “Curve” .380. Yes, it’s a bit geeky, but it immediately appealed to me. I’ll probably chase one when it comes out, and test it for me. What the heck.

      I’m not sayin’, man… just sayin’.

    1. Have you heard of supply and demand? If not you should learn to read. Maybe then you’ll understand that companies make decisions based on markets and profits. No dumb executive is going to cater to you and a thousand other weirdos. If you knew anything about weapons and/or combat you’d know that you should train to be highly proficient using both hands to shoot. Crybabies like you on here make the whole 2A community look like a bunch of whiney Huffington Post bloggers. Taurus is bringing out something innovative.

    2. Hey Dud,
      While there is certainly validity to your point of companies testing the market with what is going to sell first for them (vast majority of right handers, which I am), your response is that of a shallow flaming troll and useless. You sir, have issues.

      I’m sure if the product flies, there probably will be a reasonable run of guns for south paws.

    3. Hey Dude, some of us Lefties do train with both hands but a gun that is specifically designed for right hand wear leaves lefties not able to use it for our strong side so it is useless to us. And yes we know all about market and profits too. Making a comment that we are crybabies just because we would like the same product as well just shows your ignorance and lack of respect for fellow 2A supporters.

    4. Have you seen all the bitching. This company is TESTING a new product and is about to release it. And 99% of these comments are people crying or talking shit as if their mind is made up already. 2A people should be supporting the shit out of companies taking a GAMBLE to put money into new research and design for new products whether they are foreign and domestic. Holy shit I’ve never seen so many depressing and trashing people leaving shitty comments. It’s a curved conceal carry, and people are crying about everything from the lanyard to the caliber. So much estrogen in the 2A community these days.

    5. Who cares about their gamble? If they have a winner they’ll profit. If not, they won’t. I doubt it’ll bankrupt nor bankroll the company either way. Taurus makes a decent product, but I’d rather buy a more thoroughly tested and trusted firearm for personal defense, especially if we’re talking about a backup weapon! If I’m reaching for a backup, I want the best money can buy, period. After all, most micro sized backups are relatively inexpensive…. And oh yeah, your an ass hole.

      You should sell any firearms you may own and check yourself into some kind of facility, cause you need help. Anyone with your lack of control shouldn’t have anything to do with firearms. You damage the firearm community with your comments and possibly actions. Perhaps this is your goal? If the firearm community were an official club, where its members are able to dictate who is allowed to join or remain members, I’d say your out man. Go blog or comment elsewhere.

      (This was posted after reading only about 10-15 comments, where you and your infantile and inflammatory comments had hijacked the thread. With the deepest most sincerely heart-felt sarcasm, thank you.)

    6. Hey Dude, a lot of people are left handed. THAT DOESN’T MAKE US WEIRDOES!

      Yout attitude makes you sound like a weirdo ! Just CHILL!

    7. Hi Charles,

      I’m sure that if the product takes off they will gladly make a left hand version. Just think about all of the left handed rifles, and this is plastic. One mold will accommodate the manufacturing of many units in it’s lifetime.

      Hang tight brother and wait for it.

    8. By 10 thousand of them in one shot and they will make one just for you.
      Back to reality, they will need to first sell enough of the right handed before they will care to take a look at percentage of left handed people who actually want one.

  13. Bunch of brainless chatter, they the gun or wait for the stats on it. Taurus has a fine product. I will definitely look into it. Looks great for a close in defense weapon. Would be interested in one.

  14. Once again taurus innovation comes through.Another great idea for self defense.
    As usual the experts will talk crap about it. When s&w, ruger,or one of the other gun makers copy it, they will say “oh nice gun, good idea”.
    It’s not everyone’s cup o tea.IMO 380 is not a pistol to be aimed it’s point and shoot quick and fast the party’s over.
    This would make a good carry piece around the house and in my urban environment. I’ll have to try it out to see for myself.

  15. pure sales pitch disguised as a blogger’s opinion. he acknowledges there’s been no range test, yet uses words like ‘reliability,’ ‘innovation’ and ‘fast and easy.’ how stupid CTD must think we are.

    1. Agreed! While he trashes the community with his mindless banter, he damages it’s very image. Btw, I love 1911’s, 45’s (and many other calibers), open carry when appropriate, conceal the majority of the time, and just don’t see why “dude” would have a problem with that. He proposes that one should give support for manufactures who innovate, yet condones sharing his own reckless opinion about potential customers and fellow firearm enthusiasts. Three words come to mind here… Gun shop commando

    2. A “gun shop commando” is a self proclaimed wan-a-be gun expert who lives in his mother’s basement and thinks he knows everything there is about guns and shooting. His fiend’s neighbor’s uncle is in the teams so that makes him a bad a$$ Dude!.

  16. It’s new and it is a weapon designed for close-up kill. That’s good for me. The caliber is irrelevant and the lack of sights the same. Instinct
    will prevail when needed. It’s a good design concept that is needed and I predict it will become the next ‘judge’….

  17. Looks like it will fit right handed hip or pocket carry. It either works or it doesn’t. Time was when lasers, lights and .380 ACP were all the butt of jokes if not outright distrust. Now all three are not only widely accepted but almost considered essential in carry guns. Built in laser and light makes sense to me and I’ve been wondering when someone would make one with both. If it has a better trigger than the Ruger LCP and the feel is no worse, it should be an automatic success.

    1. Your O so right about the LCP Trigger pull. First time I shot mine I was thinking to myself “For God’s sake, when is the Sear going to finally go”, Ruger just announced that they have a “New” designed LCP with a lighter pull. I always thought of TAURUS as a “Knock-Off” firearms manufacture. This idea bears looking into as I always Conceal Carry (Ankle)

  18. I would like to get my hands on one to give it an honest assessment. I’ve learned not to pre-judge as I don’t like the taste of either crow or my own feet.

    Taurus has made quite a few respectable firearms and they’re pretty affordable. Even if this gun design flops Taurus has explored an area that should have been checked out already. In the field of handgun R & D there is not much progress these days because everybody is playing follow the leader. There have been no real new gun designs, rather what we see is the refinement of older designs. Refinement is a god thing and I greatly appreciate it but it would be nice to see some new designs open up and that can’t happen if the manufacturers aren’t willing to spend the money or receive criticism. Being fearful of hurting your reputation will stop most from being creative so when we consumers criticize we hamper progress.

    There is a saying going through my mind right now and it goes kinda like this: “if you ain’t got somethin good to say then don’t say nothin at all”. Critiquing the product is quite a bit different from criticizing the product. But then I think we all can understand that.

    God bless

  19. I like the lock back feature that many small frame weapons don’t have. The 5 lb, trigger with long pull is appropriate for safety in a B/U or hideout weapon. 5 to 8lb seems to be the industry standard. Hope to see some independent testing to see if it’s as reliable as the video suggests, specifically, feeding of HP ammo.

  20. You people are opposed to anything new and different. If you try it and do not like it, then state your opinion. It may be a piece of crap, but you don’t know that yet. A .380 could kill your ass just fine. A 5lb trigger pull is no problem in a self defense situation. It’s not meant to be a competition target pistol. Gun snobs.

  21. @ Dom.

    It’s a specialized Survival/Defensive Gun produced for the Soviet Space Program. In case Cosmonauts were force to land area’s, where they could be reached by regular means. Current Cosmonauts of the International Space Station as still issued then today. I’m pretty sure they were produced in large numbers, because of the other handy uses (a.e. Putin).

    1. I read the first line and stopped to think about it before I read on. Was puzzled as to why they would need such a survival weapon in space would have thought a cyanide tablet would work better, but then being stranded in Siberia would require ways to get food and protect yourself. Wonder if I can get my hands on one would make a great coffee table conversation piece.

    1. @ Michael S.

      I think another STUPID feature is, the Lanyard Hole new the end of the barrel. Anyone DUMB enough to hang the gun around the Neck, Has 50/50 chance of blowing their own brains out. But, it does give new meaning too Passive Assisted Suicide.

    2. @ Blast.

      When your looking at the gun face on, First you”l see the Barrel Opening. Just below that two small White LED Lights and just below that the Laser Designator. And lastly, below that, the Lanyard Hole. You can see it in the Video.

    3. nother industry-first, an integrated LaserLyte LED light and laser combo system built within the frame makes for efficient target acquisition during most lighting scenarios. On the rear of the slide and designed for instinctual point shooting at close distances, is the bore axis sighting system. This subcompact handgun does not feature traditional sights to keep the concealed carry design smooth and snag-free. The textured grip and the low bore axis of this pistol deliver comfortable shooting and mild recoil.

    1. Didn’t everyone dislike the P-90 when it was first introduced because it was ugly and it took awhile but was accepted for the most part

  22. I agree with David 2014. It’s hard enough to learn, train, and maintain proper grip with traditional pistols. This will throw in a whole new twist to proper grip control. Just my opinion and worth what you paid for it!

  23. There also the “Holy Whatever” category, too?

    A Soviet design triple-barreled, two over/one under called the TP82. It’s two 12.5×70 (40-Gauge Shotgun) and one (5.45x39mm). I don’t if there available outside Russia. But might be worth trying to looking into.

  24. I’m a bit surprised by all the criticism here. I remain convinced that if Taurus doubled their prices, they’d get a lot more respect from many, all else being equal, just because they’re not so “cheap.”

    Personally, I refuse to dress around a gun, and I happily carry a Ruger LCP with Crimson Trace for EDC. Seven rounds of .380 is more than enough for an assailant within 20 feet, and if he’s further than 20 feet, good luck with your court case unless you live in Mogadishu.

    Taurus should be commended for thinking outside the box. On the other hand, they have had more than their share of quality issues, and reliability in a carry weapon is by far the most important requirement. I’ll need to see some data after a few thousand rounds go through a few thousand guns before I’ll bite, but if they hold up I’ll be a buyer for sure.

    1. Never really had a problem with Taurus when I did have a few. Then I decided to buy American made guns and got rid of them. Ruger and M&P also make very affordable guns and I have yet to have a reliability issue with either. The difference of course is that they are both American Made.

    1. Back to Secundius

      I had never heard about that caliber before. And the TP82 beats the hell out of my 410 over 22 combo gun thank you for broadening horizons! Looks like a mini 22WSSM wonder if that would over penetrate your target? Either way I like all the oddball or wildcats keeps people thinking of ways to improve and new ideas individualism at its best. After all we can not be punished for thought crimes not yet anyway 2+2=5

    1. And you base your “suckness” on what qualifying factors? Leaches are efficiently designed for what they do.

  25. “Could this be the Holy Grail? A concealed carry handgun that is “print-free” as well as comfortable in any position on the body? Taurus is claiming its new CURVE will deliver just that.”

    As long as you are right-handed.

    1. @ Ron.

      I would exactly put into the category of “Holy Grail”, but more in line of “Holy S@#t”. The 12-gauge 2+1 Mossberg Maverick Super Shorty.

  26. “Stopping power ” is a myth. Even expansion and muzzle energy are misunderstood, in regards to handgun calibers. Handguns don’t create permanent stretch cavities like rifle rounds do.

    Pretty much, it either reaches vital organs or it doesn’t. My 147gr Winchester Ra9b does that even better than most .357 sig, with higher capacity and less recoil.

    Everyone should carry what they trust, themselves. If it’s .380, .25, or even .223-kurtz (lol). I was just sharing what I believe and why.

    We should all, regardless of caliber, follow Gunfight Rule #1!

  27. Ok. So I agree with that. I thought you were speaking on behalf of the .380 in favor of it. When I’m dressed I carry my Kahr cm9, all other times a .40. but for church the Kahr is still to big. That’s why I’m getting a Sunday morning gun. Beretta’s Pico .380.

  28. Yes, .380 is a “shortened” 9mm(ish). What’s lost in that process is bullet weight and velocity, both of which are critical to penetration-which is the cornerstone of physical incapacitation.

    .380 is better than nothing, but the FBI (who studies ballistics relentlessly) has never approved a .380 for “duty use”. There are only a few approved .38 rounds though.

    The question is, “Does it matter”, and that’s a personal one. I won’t carry a .380 because, on the off chance of doing everything else right in a defensive encounter (harder than most people think), I don’t want to have the outcome decided by a poor performing round.

    Greg Ellefritz of Active Response Training did collate some data that suggests that “lesser calibers” may be effective. His blog is a “must-read” for CCWers. I still don’t see a reason to tempt fate. I can tuck a Shield 9 into my business/dress clothes just fine. YMMV

  29. Yes, you said it, a .380 is a 9mm short! It is not a 9, does not have the same penetration,, ballistic. Two different rounds.

  30. @ Dom.

    I don’t know if you are aware of this, but a .380ACP is a 9-mil short or (9x17mmKruz/Parabellum). Only slight smaller the the regular 9x19mm/Parabellum. Oh, by the way, the word “Kruz” is German for Short.

    1. @ secundias

      Yup well aware of the 380 being 9×17 and it’s brothers makarov being 9×18 and luger being 9×19 I have no problem with diameter just weight of the bullet and the case it sits in. There is a reason why there are several calibers in .35 and it’s because it will do the job. 38 special 357 magnum also fit in this category along with along with many more.

      I am also aware that shot placement has alot to do with what people should carry and 380 is just as deadly as any cartridge in the right hands but how do you train with your adrenaline pumping when your hands go numb and feet don’t move and can’t make the CNS shot to stop someone in their tracks with the 380. You’d only piss off the drug crazed lunatics with a center mass shot and you will still be in hot water, whereas with the extra weight and velocity of the 9×19 you have a chance of penetrating to the spine eliminating the threat.

      Also on carrying a 357 sig you still have potential for some exposure or framing, but usually the only ones that take notice and can see someone carrying concealed is an ally and carrying themselves. But since the entire point of carrying concealed is letting as few of people know your armed I like the direction of the curve.

    2. Extra weight from a 9mm? Seriously Dom? The average 380 is 95 gr and the average 9mm is 115 gr. I’m guessing you have no idea about weapons. You probably swear by a 1911 too.

  31. The only time a .380 comes into play for me is maybe when I’m dressed up (and even the 9mm subcompact is to big) and always for going to Church on Sunday.

  32. Where do I buy? That little curve will do wonders for concealment and comfort. Anyone talking crap about this doesn’t understand the idea of CC. My CC serves to be the weapon that gets me to my G19 or AR pistol in my truck. And that’ll hopefully get me to my Sig 716 DMR at home if need be. Do the crap talkers on her use Desert Eagles as their CCs?

  33. I really like the idea of the curve and the reach for new design. What I do not like is caliber, not a fan of 380 in any application 9×19 should be the smallest carried in my opinion. Lanyard, I see this ending badly when someone starts fumbling in the heat of the moment, might do the bad guys job for them. Finally I hate the fact that there is a key to turn your firearm into a bludgeoning weapon, I believe firmly that it should be optional and not standard.

  34. It’s a gimmick! A .380 is not going to print anyway. Get the S&W or Beretta’s Pico, they can be had with a light or laser.

  35. I do not see any mention of a LEFT hand model. Gun manufacturer wake up not every one is right handed, and there are even right handed people that shoot left handed.

  36. I’ve not been a fan of Taurus or any low-end firearms – cheap guns seem like a bad idea in general.. But I very much like innovative designs, and a gun designed to reduce printing fits that bill. Weight is as important as printing, and 10.2 ounces isn’t bad at all. The only gun that is useful is the one you have at the moment, so anything that encourages a person to have one with them is good. I would take a look at this. We have to encourage innovation, there are all ready tons of “normal” semi-autos available. If it’s not your thing, cool…. doesn’t mean it doesn’t have its place.

    1. Taurus is not cheap; lets make distinction between cheap and inexpensive. I own Taurus Judge: a quality made firearm that stands up to the quality of any other mfg. I own handguns from Browning, Ruger, Springfield, T/C and more. Taurus is not a cheap firearm. It may cost less but that don’t make it cheap

  37. Does not look much different than if you attach a laser sight under the barrel on others. I wish they would publish the ‘pound pull’ it takes to chamber a round. The trigger pull on my wife’s . 38 revolver was to hard, even with reduced springs, so we went to a .380 auto. Her wrist has been broken in 8 places and she does not have the strength to chamber a round. We tried a ‘bunch’ before we found one she could use. The Ruger was my choice but she could not work it.

  38. I would only use this as a backup weapon. The way it’s curved you can only use it if you’re right handed. Like the laser and light integration, but come on ergonomically designed. Who are they aiming this for teachers?

  39. The down side is that, because of it’s shape, if you ever have to deploy it, someone might think it’s a Taser. This doesn’t really matter if you’re drawing it with the intent of immediately shooting someone, but if you want to use it as a visual deterrent, you might end up just emboldening your target.

    1. Personally, I would never draw a weapon as a deterrent. If I draw my weapon, my intentions are to shoot somebody.

  40. @ Carl.

    I’d like to know who the “Wile E. Coyote” Super Genius was, who put the lanyard hole next to the barrel and what’s up with the ergonomic design.

  41. Well, maybe it’s me, but I cannot see this gun ever making it into production. Why? It has not one attractive feature. I know Taurus may not be S&W, but come on, this is what you throw R&D money into? Who would buy this gun, and why? Color me confused.

  42. Wonder when they will make it in a decent caliber like at least 9mm? I have yet to buy a .32, a .25 or a.380. I suspect I am not alone in that thinking.
    Other than the caliber, they might have hit on something and I wonder who will be next to follow? Remington needs a hit after the R-51 debacle. Ruger’s sales are declining. Could be the start of a trend, if it sells well?

    1. You a caliber snob of some sort? Heck, man, I’ve owned .22, .25., .32, .380, 9mm, .44Spl, .45LC, .45ACP – liked all of ’em, loved some of ’em. Owned 5 & 6 shot revolvers, semi-autos, single shots, derringers, smokeless and black powder – like all of ’em, loved some of ’em. Owned fixed and target sights, glow in the dark sights, optics, no rear sights, no sights at all – liked all of ’em, loved some of ’em. Heck, don’t think this 70+ yrs old has yet met a firearm I didn’t like, at least a little, for one reason or another.

      Just sayin’…

  43. I have owned several Taurus and found them to be of decent quality and dependable. However I have sold all of them through the years due to my desire to purchase only American made guns. Never had any problem with them though.
    This Curve is a gimmick something like the gun with the barrel on the bottom. I suspect with good marketing Taurus will sell them to new gun owners but I don’t think serious shooters will be buying them. I am one of those guys that think the aesthetics of a gun is important and this thing is less than Inspiring.

  44. It is hard for me to hear all the negativity about Taurus. I have owned and still own several Taurus firearms and have found then to be as reliable as any others. You get what you pay for and for that matter sometime you get less as in the Glock 42 with the “rolling recall” the Sig P238 still having trigger inconsistency problems and, oh yeah, my Remington R51 that has been back at the Remington factory since April still waiting for replacement, I will add that to the Ruger LCP that would not fire a magazine without failure until the factory reworked it. Let’s give this Taurus a chance it looks like a good deep cover pistol.

  45. Yeah, like Throw-Away Disposable Cell-Phones, the “Taurus Throw-Away’s”. Has a nice sound to it, don’t you think. The New Saturday-Night Specials. Shoot, Scoot, and Ditch. Hey, maybe they’ll make them “biodegradable”, too…

  46. Wow! 2 whole magazines for the “range test”! That’s plenty to see if it’s reliable!

    Seriously? Taurus has a bad reputation on any gun they don’t copy. When the military contract you have has a massive recall and there are videos out there of people making their guns fire without being on the trigger, credibility goes out the window.

    If they don’t fix their image with quality, the only people who buy their guns will be those who don’t know any better. That number will continue to decrease.

  47. Is a “gimmick”, to pull them out of their financial slump. I think they should “re-tool” and design and manufacture a completely New Line of products, Instead of trying to “breath life” into a dead or dying product line. Taurus is trying to CHEAP their way out of the hole that they, themselves created…

  48. How is it that fellow is pulling the empty mag, and then dropping the slide? He did it a couple times in the video, means it is a habit. I’ll bet he closes the cylinder on his Smiths with a flick of the wrist.

    Other than that, I’m wondering what the trend is to ugly guns. Ew! Nice sharp edges, if not a traditional shape, will still “print.” That there is something will be obvious. Beveled edges help. No?

    1. “Dropping the slide” is something you WANT to be a habit, per all the instructors I’ve ever had (and I’ve had more than a few). You don’t want to let a slide go forward lightly during a serious social interaction, and have the action fail to go into battery for that reason. “Train like you’ll fight, because you’ll fight like you train.”

      Just sayin’…

  49. Its to bad that they don’t make speed loaders For there had guns for it takes four men and two Bulls to lad that clip of mine

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your discussions, feedback and comments are welcome here as long as they are relevant and insightful. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. All comments are held for moderation and will appear after approval.

Discover more from The Shooter's Log

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading