I have been surprised at the popularity of the Glock 19 9mm versus that of the Glock 23 .40S&W among civilian shooters.
I do not know anyone that carries the Glock 23 on their own time and their own dime. Practically everyone in my circle of friends and associates owns at least one Glock 19.
The handguns are identical in size and shape and fit the same holsters. My yardstick, tape measure and calipers show that each is 7.35 inches long, about 5.0 inches high and 1.18 inches thick.
They weigh but 23.6 ounces unloaded and pump up to about 32 ounces loaded. Neither Glock features a manual safety. The firing pin block and safety lever in the trigger are the whole show. True safety is between the ears.
Glock 19 vs. Glock 23
The real difference is in magazine capacity. The Glock 19 9mm features a 15-round magazine while the Glock 23 .40 caliber pistol carries 13 rounds in the magazine.
Clearly, either holds enough cartridges on tap for any foreseeable difficulty.
The Glock 23 features the typical Glock double-action-only trigger. There is only one trigger action to learn. In my example, the action is fast and light enough at six pounds. Trigger reset is rapid.
The Glock 23 is snag-free, fast into action, and simply feels good in the hands. The sights are adequate for the task at hand, especially with the night sight option. The Glock is easily field stripped and maintained.
Overall, the Glock 23 is not only a good concealed carry handgun, but an acceptable service pistol as well.
|15-yard accuracy, Glock 23, from a solid bench rest|
|Hornady 155-grain XTP||1.8 inches|
|Winchester 155-grain Silvertip||2.0 inches|
|Remington 180-grain Golden Saber||2.25 inches|
This brings us to the obvious comparison. The Glock Model 23 is chambered for the .40 Smith & Wesson cartridge. The .40 is a result of many studies into problems that have dogged police side arms for over 100 years.
The Smith & Wesson .38 Special handled well and was mild to fire. The problem was that it did not do the job it was intended to do.
The original 158-grain RNL .38 load was often called a “widowmaker” because it failed the officers carrying it.
Eventually, the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge was chambered in a relatively compact revolver. The Smith & Wesson Model 19, and the later Model 13, were great service revolvers.
Problem was, they were difficult to control without extensive training. The magnum cartridge was also hard on the gun. They did not crack or blow, but magnum recoil was hard on small parts.
The .40 was shoehorned into the 9mm frame in much the same manner and much the same problems surfaced.
The .40 S&W is more difficult to control than the 9mm and weapon wear is regarded as greater, although this differs from brand to brand.
Will we ever learn? Yet, a study by the Feds some years ago confirmed what many harness cops already knew. A handgun over 35 ounces becomes a burden by the end of the day.
The 9mm size handgun is ideal for carrying and for hand fit. A .45 caliber pistol such as the excellent Glock 21 is a stretch for most hand sizes.
A general consensus was reached—supported by well-documented cases and by research—that the 9mm wasn’t enough for police work.
|Water test results||Velocity||Penetration||Expansion|
|Hornady Critical Defense 115-grain FTX||1140 fps||14.0||.56|
|Cor Bon 115-grain DPX +P||1235 fps||11.0||.63|
|Winchester Ranger 147-grain SXT||940 fps||15.0||.54|
|Hornady 155-grain XTP||1090 fps||17.5||.72|
|Cor Bon 135-grain JHP||1290 fps||12.0||.70|
|Remington 180-grain Golden Saber||980 fps||14.5||.65|
We could debate the 9mm from here to Ragnorak, but the fact remains the 9mm’s wound potential isn’t up to the .45 ACP—but the .45 is too heavy to carry.
I am certain a .45 can be made as light as a 9mm, but the .900-inch long cartridge case demands a long grip frame. The same goes for the 10mm.
The .40 had been kicking around for a while in the form of the centimeter round—.41 Action Express and others. The .40 S&W was a success story.
There were a few cracks in the canvas, however. One Federal agency rushed to adopt the Glock 32 and went back to the 9mm because the officers were not qualifying to the previous high standard with the Glock 23.
This is understandable. Recoil is greater. The first runs of .40 caliber ammunition did not display a high degree of accuracy. Some were loaded perhaps too hot.
Various loads demonstrate excellent wound potential. I have added a few results garnered from experimentation with water from 21st Century Stopping Power, Paladin Press.
The author is a military intelligence officer and the results are verifiable and repeatable. As you can see the results with the .40 caliber across the spectrum of light and heavy bullets and various velocity gives better wound potential than the 9mm. But this isn’t the whole story.
|9mm||Power||.40 S&W||Power||.45 ACP||Power|
|115 grains 1140 fps||13||155 grains 1090 fps||17||230 grains 868 fps||19.9|
|115 grains 1235 fps||14||135 grains 1290 fps||17||185 grains 920 fps||17|
|147 grains 940 fps||14||180 grains 980 fps||17.5|
Shot placement means a great deal. The Glock 19 9mm is easier to shoot well than the .40 caliber pistol. While recoil energy may be calculated, the easiest way is to calculate power factor.
This is bullet weight times velocity divided by 1,000. It is generally regarded that a power factor of 20 or above is too much for control by most shooters in a personal defense gun.
9mm defense loads rate 13 to 14, the .40 runs to 17 and over. The 230-grain .45 is at 20; the .45 ACP 185-grain standard load is at about 17. (The PF isn’t the whole picture—the full-size Glock 21 .45 is among the easiest-kicking handguns in the Glock line due to size and weight.)
So we have a pistol that hits hard, but kicks harder. Gee, Einstein was right! Many shooters find themselves choosing the 9mm if they want a lot of shots and the .45 if they want knockdown power. Nothing wrong with that, but they ignore the .40.
As for myself, I like the Glock 23. I have been impressed by the results I have carefully researched and cataloged. For those willing to practice and accept lower times between shots, greater recoil, and perhaps slightly less absolute accuracy, the Model 23 offers excellent real-world ballistics.
The Glock 23 is as accurate to a fast first shot as the Glock 19. For those considering a compact pistol and moving from the .45, the Glock 23 offers the best of both worlds. The Glock 23 isn’t for everyone, but which handgun is? It is a well-balanced and reliable handgun, and it is all Glock.
|Action Type||Semi-automatic/Safe Action|
|Barrel Length||4.02 inches|
|Overall Height||4.99 inches|
|Overall Length||7.36 inches|
|Overall Width||1.18 inches|
|Weight Unloaded||21.16 ounces|
9mm or .40 S&W? Do you carry the Glock 23 or Glock 19? Share your experiences with the Glock 23, 19 or your preferred Glock in the comment section.