California’s Proposition 63 requires individuals who wish to purchase ammunition to first obtain a permit.
The measure then mandates dealers to check this permit before selling ammunition, and will halt the mail-order sale of ammunition to California residents.
What does this mean for California gun owners? Do you have a plan to stock up before Prop 63 goes into effect?
Proposition 63 — The Legal Stuff
In July 2016, California enacted legislation to regulate the sale of ammunition.
The legislation requires individuals and businesses to obtain a one-year license from the California Department of Justice to sell ammunition.
The legislation also requires sellers to conduct background checks of purchasers with the Department of Justice. Some provisions of the legislation repealed and replaced parts of Proposition 63.
Changes to State Law
Proposition 63 will require individuals who wish to purchase ammunition to first obtain a permit. The measure then mandates dealers to check this permit before selling ammunition.
The measure also eliminated several exemptions to the large-capacity magazine ban and increased the penalty for possessing them.
Proposition 63 enacted a court process that attempts to ensure prohibited individuals do not continue to have firearms.
Striking Down Proposition 63
On May 17, 2017, five residents of San Diego County and the California Rifle & Pistol Association filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Xavier Becerra in the U.S. District Court for Southern California.
Plaintiffs said that California Penal Code Section 32310, as amended by Proposition 63, violated the Second Amendment, Takings Clause, and Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Proposition 63’s added Section 32310(c) was designed to make the possession of large-capacity ammunition magazines an infraction or misdemeanor.
The initiative also added 32310(d), which required owners of large-capacity ammunition magazines to dispose of the magazines by removing them from the state, selling them to a licensed firearms dealer, or surrendering them to a law enforcement agency.
These sections of Proposition 63 were set to go into effect on July 1, 2017.
On June 29, 2017, Judge Roger Benitez ordered Attorney General Becerra to not enforce or implement Proposition 63’s Section 32310(c) and Section 32310(d).
Judge Benitez’s order is a preliminary injunction, meaning the order is temporary pending the conclusion of the legal case.
Judge Benitez said Proposition 63’s section on large-capacity magazines is likely unconstitutional because it “burdens the core of the Second Amendment by criminalizing the mere possession of these magazines that are commonly held by law-abiding citizens for defense of self, home, and state.”
He also stated, “The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table.”
Starting in July 2019, the July 2016 legislation would have prohibited most California residents from purchasing ammunition outside the state and bringing it into the state without first having it delivered to a licensed dealer.
Proposition 63 moved up the start date of this law to January 2018. It also made bringing out-of-state ammunition into the state, without first delivering it to a dealer, an infraction.
Plan of Action
Lower competition will likely lead to higher prices, not to mention California’s high sales tax rate.
California could also follow other states by adding a sin tax to ammunition in the future, which would further lead to ammunition prices reaching near unattainable levels.
Your best defense is to stock up now. If you have the means to buy everything you will need for the foreseeable future, act now.
If, like most of us, that would more than strain the budget, you can buy some ammunition each month over the next six months — before the new law goes into effect January 1, 2018.
First, you need a plan. You may only own one gun or guns all of a single caliber, which makes your decision fairly easy. All you have to do is stock up on ammunition of that caliber — split for the intended uses.
For example, if you have a home defense pistol, you would need a moderate supply of defensive rounds and the bulk of your stockpile would be training rounds.
On the other hand, you may have a home defense pistol and rifle in which you would want to split your stockpile and weigh how many rounds you had for each by the amount of practice you plan with each weapon.
If you also had a shotgun, the formula would be about the same for each.
Hunting considerations should be similar to your previous plans for home defense.
You are going to need to prioritize by the caliber(s) you shoot most for practice and then the specific bullet types and weights you are most likely to hunt with in the field, plus an extra box for zeroing your scope or confirming zero before the hunt.
How Many Rounds Do You Need?
I am of the school that you can never have too many rounds of ammunition. I own multiple guns safes that each carries their share and then some.
But let’s talk minimums that will keep you covered. Let’s start with a Modern Sporting Rifle such as an AR-15 as your primary long gun and a GLOCK as your sidearm.
Two basic load-outs for the AR would be 420 rounds. Even in a SHTF scenario, you should be able to get by on 365 rounds. Add those together with a little rounding and you have 800 rounds of .223.
Ball ammunition is cheaper of course, but hunting ammunition and self-defense ammo may be interchangeable and ball is a poor rounding for hunting.
For your sidearm, 17×3=51, plus one round in the chamber equals 52. Double that for a basic loadout, and you are just over 100 rounds.
Few of us are ever going to worry about using a GLOCK for hunting, so this will suffice as a strong minimum for storage and preparation.
For me, that would also be per (adult or shooting age) person when looking at the long term.
For example, in a defensive situation, my wife and I have worked out plans where we can cover different areas of the house, set up fatal funnels in a crossfire etc.
If I were in a Californian’s shoes right now, I would have to take that into account as well — not to mention doubling the practice ammo allotment to cover both of us.
Look at your needs, means, and potential future requirements. Then make a plan that fits your needs. You’ll save some money, avoid some onerous regulations, and most importantly, be prepared.
Hopefully, organizations such as California Rifle and Pistol Association, NRA-ILA, Second Amendment Foundation, and others will find a way to kill this silly regulation using the Interstate Commerce Clause or something.
However, if it were that simple, I am sure the legal minds of these organizations would have already so. All you can do in the meantime is stock up while you still have time.
Do you think the remainder of Proposition 63 will be stricken down by the courts? How many rounds would you buy to prepare for the licensing, registration and potentially higher prices in the future after Prop 63 takes effect in 2018? Share your answers, questions or concerns in the comment section.