The Striker Fired Revolution

By Wilburn Roberts published on in Firearms

I have observed a number of revolutions in the handgun world. The Glock pistol and the popularity of polymer frame handguns was one. A vast improvement in quality in 1911 handguns, led by Kimber, was another.

Striker-Fired Handgun

Another advantage of the striker-fired handguns is a simpler mechanism.

Today, another change is coming.

This is the modification of existing hammer-fired handguns into new models with a striker-fired system. The Ruger LC9 became the LC9-S, the HK P30 is the VP9, the SIG P250 became the SIG P320 and the Walther PPQ has also been modified. It is pretty interesting and not without precedent.

When John Moses Browning developed the Colt 1903 pocket pistol, he included a concealed hammer in the design. With the Browning 1910 he used a striker. Today the most popular striker-fired handgun is the Glock, followed closely by the Smith and Wesson M&P. Earlier striker-fired single-action handguns were not nearly as safe. This is because the striker was fully cocked upon racking the slide.

Glock defines the modern double-action only striker-fired handgun. The slide is racked—or operated by recoil energy—and the striker is partly cocked or prepped. A press on the trigger moves the striker to the rear against spring pressure. At a point in travel the sear releases and the striker rushes forward to fire the cartridge. This is repeated with every shot.

The action has advantages.

Ruger LC9s

The Ruger LC9s is a great pocket pistol that actually shoots well.

As an example, I found the original Ruger LC9 a useful handgun. Many years of experience with the double-action revolver was an aid. However, I noticed in my training classes that not everyone enjoyed such good results with the LC9.

The new striker-fired version has a lighter trigger press and short reset. It is a downright crisp action.

Most shooters can use this handgun much better than the original. It is difficult to pull a hammer requiring 12 pounds of compression against a 20-ounce handgun and still provide accurate fire. The striker-fire handgun provides this accuracy.

With proper safety measures, such as a lever in the trigger to prevent lateral discharge, safety is retained. All true safety, however, is between the ears.

Considerable redesign is required between the original hammer-fired handguns and the new striker-fired handguns. Many resemble the original product although they are very different. In most cases the slide, barrel and magazine are the same. The lockwork is not.

SIG P320

The SIG P320 has given good results in firing test.

The SIG P320 has turned out well and SIG hopes to sell quite a few. This handgun features a firing system many will feel is a single action, rather than a double-action only; the system is complex enough that the point is debatable.

Among the new and popular striker-fired Walther handguns is the PPQ. A handgun with a storied past beginning with the P99, the PPQ offers modern lines and good performance. The action is light, clean and crisp with excellent reset speed. I fired a good bit of the Federal American Eagle 115-grain FMJ load in this handgun; I find it responds well to a trained shooter. Practical accuracy is excellent.

I have also fired a good number of the Speer Gold Dot 124-grain loads in this firearm. Accuracy is good and overall the conversion to striker fire seems well conceived and executed.

HK VP9

The HK VP9 is among the friendliest 9mm handguns to fire.

Another first-rate new striker-fired handgun is the Heckler and Koch VP9. There was not anything wrong with P30; now you have a choice. The VP9 is an essentially excellent handgun with many good features. I have fired this handgun with Federal’s HST loads including the powerful +P versions and found it controllable and accurate.

What’s the Big Deal

Now, what is the big deal about striker-fired handguns? The hammer-fired handguns require a strong hammer spring to drive the hammer home and strike the firing pin, igniting the primer.

  • The striker and spring are one in the striker-fired handgun.
  • There is no hammer spring in the frame.
  • Slide movement partially cocks the striker and the trigger cocks and releases it in the final movement—in most striker-fired firearms.
  • The system allows good trigger control.

Moreover, what is trigger control? Pretty simple.

Trigger control is simply pressing the trigger without disturbing the aim. The striker-fired firearm excels in this type of fire.

Defensive firing at close range doesn’t demand great accuracy; it does demand great control, a rapid trigger reset and maintaining the sight picture. The striker-fired handguns give us that. Plus, most feature rapid trigger reset.

After looking over the present offerings, I am not likely to ditch my long serving hammer-fired handguns. However, if I was in the market today, and both models were available, I am certain that I would choose the striker-fired models.

I did so recently, choosing an LC9S as a backup and deep concealment handgun. The striker-fired revolution is a happy one.

What do you think of hammer-fired vs. striker-fired systems? For or against? Share your opinion in the comment section.

Tags: , , , , ,

Trackback from your site.

The mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!'s blog, "The Shooter's Log," is to provide information-not opinions-to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!

Comments (19)

  • Don Haines

    |

    Thor, My first duty semi-auto was a S&W Model 59. After I left the department, I purchased one for myself. I carried it for many years. Today, I have & love my S&W 5906.

    Reply

  • Don Haines

    |

    Bob, you might have inserted the word “But” as in “But doesn’t have a magazine disconnect” For some of us, having a mag disconnect is considered a positive. I think adding that feature was a request/requirement for police departments. As a LEO, I know I considered it a good thing. And if you remember, according to reports (which may or may not be accurate) Michael Brown had tried to grab Daren Wilson’s gun. Many officers have been killed with their own guns, so having the ability to release the mag to render the gun inoperable can save lives.

    Reply

    • Bob Clevenger

      |

      Don, I was replying directly to Thor’s comment that: “…if you’re lucky you…disable the need for a magazine to be inserted to fire.”

      I know that many feel that a mag disconnect is a good feature and others feel just the opposite. Weapon retention is a very important thing. No question. Just because something is requested/required by one or more police departments does not make that thing a good one for everyone. NYPD required a heavier trigger from Glock. They had their reasons. That doesn’t make heavy triggers good for everyone.

      Reply

  • Thor Odinson

    |

    I like a combination of power, features, looks & complete SS. I have only found that in S&W Generation 3 semi-autos. Double action, a real hammer, 10mm, and after-market grips that give you a grip while absorbing recoil. If you are lucky you get adjustable rear sights and disable the necessity for a magazine to be inserted to fire.

    Glocks & Sigs don’t make it past the looks test. Plastic? Not a chance!
    S&W quit making the best pistol out there but the 10mm is coming back so maybe there’s hope!! Thor

    Reply

    • Bob Clevenger

      |

      Thor — Have you looked at the EAA Witness pistols? They are all steel, have a traditional hammer, can be carried cocked and locked or not as you wish, are SA/DA, do not have a magazine disconnect, and have a great grip feel (to my hands). Oh yeah, they make them in 10mm.

      Reply

  • Don Haines

    |

    I like the option of thumbing back the hammer allowing for a single action trigger pull. As a kid, I learned to draw and shoot with a Colt SAA replica. So I’m used to drawing and thumbing back the trigger in one action. OK, so I’m a dinosaur. So be it. LOL Maybe that’s why I carry a 1911 or some other DA/SA pistol most of the time. But just to be fair, I just got a M&P Shield and I like the way it shoots. It is my back up gun. Easy to carry, easy to hide.

    Reply

  • Don Haines

    |

    I’m confused. I thought Glocks lacked a safety. Do you mean a thumb safety? Or are you referring to the trigger safety on the Glock? I don’t consider the trigger safety on a Glock, a real safety. But that’s just me.

    Reply

  • Dave Herrington

    |

    You mentioned the PPQ in your comments, I have a PPX and was wondering what your thoughts are on this weapon. I like it because it fits my ham size hands really well, a problem I’ve had in the past. I don’t shoot near as often as I would like and probably not as often as I should, but I found this to be pretty accurate and easy to shoot. I had a Glock 22 years ago and the PPX fits me and shoots for me about the same although I really wish I hadn’t gotten rid of it. The only problem I have is I never realized this had no manual safety, I know, it’s pretty amazing I missed that, but I got it online and never noticed.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your discussions, feedback and comments are welcome here as long as they are relevant and insightful. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. All comments are held for moderation and will appear after approval.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

%d bloggers like this: