Smith and Wesson 686 Plus — A Go Anywhere Do Anything Handgun

By Bob Campbell published on in Firearms, Reviews

I do not buy into the ultra compact handgun for concealed carry and feel any caliber below 9mm or .38 Special +P isn’t suitable for personal defense. I work my wardrobe around concealed carry, not the other way around. While I occasionally bow to necessity, most often I carry an effective handgun in a service grade caliber.

Smith and Wesson L frame and K frame revolvers

The Smith and Wesson L frame with three-inch barrel isn’t much heavier than a four inch K frame .38

This may be a Commander .45, .40 Glock, or a short barrel magnum revolver. These handguns are my go-anywhere do-anything handguns. No matter what type of situation I am in, these handguns will be the measure of the problem.

Personal defense is most important. Home defense is important and while size is less of a consideration in a home defense handgun, I usually keep the pistol I have carried during the day at home ready. Another concern is defense against animals in the wild, with an unfortunate incident in the news every week it seems. This may not be as important to you as it is to those of us that explore the wild.

The carry gun should be capable of handling many chores well. Handguns are individual and I think that my choice may not be yours. However, you should not discount the revolver or the .357 Magnum out of hand—unless you have tried it. While the Centurions did well with each carrying an identical Gladius, and the Army issues the same handgun to all officers and soldiers, the armed citizen has the opportunity to choose a credible handgun that will serve his needs well.

Bob Campbell shooting the smith and wesson 686 plus revolver front

Even with Magnum loads the 686 Plus is controllable.

Today, there is always a counter argument to the author’s recommendations, and that is fine, but consider the source. I have served as a peace officer and been involved in—survived—critical incidents. I have studied wound ballistics for decades. Most importantly, I am a person who has spent his life shooting many types of handguns. I prefer to think that my writings are more of a conclusion than opinion, but that is your decision to make.

I admit to strong preferences for one handgun or the other based on experience. It isn’t easy to accept that a different handgun will serve as well as the types that have served so well, for so long. However, I am willing to learn. Among the facts that I have discovered in research is that in the average personal defense encounter few shots are fired. If you do not get your man down by the third shot your battle may be over.

Incidents in which many shots were fired involve high-capacity handguns and a great deal of misses. This is partly because of fear, panic, and because those involved had little or no training. The distance involved is usually less than 21 feet, more toward three to five yards. In training, thousands of shooters over the past 40 years, I have experienced far more malfunctions with self-loaders than revolvers.

Most of these are shooter-induced malfunctions were by individuals that did not understand how to run a handgun, and many that did not take the time to learn to load and fire the handgun before attending class. The revolver may have a malfunction that is difficult to clear—only well-worn revolvers and those of poor quality are subject to these problems, in my experience.

special edition Smith and Wesson L frame

The special edition Smith and Wesson L frame with unfluted cylinder is an accurate and reliable handgun.

As an example, a few years ago a major chain store offered .38 caliber revolvers at the bargain basement price of $229. Several showed up in my class. All were rough and several suffered the actions binding during the drills. At least one simply refused to fire. Buy quality. A revolver is simpler to load and use. Unless you are willing to undertake training and regular practice, you have no business with a self-loading pistol.

Self-loading pistols use the action of the cartridge to rack the slide and make the piece ready for another shot. Revolvers are operated by the user’s firing hand. The trigger action cocks and drops the hammer. Some of the energy expended is used to rotate the cylinder. While the double-action trigger may be heavier than a self-loader’s trigger, the action is often smooth. The long rolling pull helps in avoiding the anticipation of recoil with powerful loads, beginning with the .38 Special +P.

The revolver cartridge most suited to personal defense is the .357 Magnum. Powerful and effective, this load produces ideal wound ballistics with the greatest likelihood of stopping a threat with a single shot. Some may feel the magnum is too powerful for the occasional shooter. They may be correct.

However, if the revolver is a medium-frame revolver with plenty of steel to absorb recoil and a heavy lugged barrel for balance, the .357 Magnum is surprisingly controllable by those who practice. While the ultra-light revolvers have a place, my .357 Magnum revolvers are steel-frame handguns. I also believe that a barrel shorter than three inches is counter productive in a .357 Magnum revolver. Two to 2.5-inch barrel revolvers do not properly burn the relatively slow burning powders that generate the velocity that differentiates the .357 Magnum from the .38 Special +P. The difference may be more than 300 feet-per-second in a three-inch barrel, and that is worthwhile.

Bob Campbell shooting the smith and wesson 686 plus revolver one-handed

Firing from the one hand shoulder point the 686 Plus is well balanced.

The Ideal Magnum

My newest, and favorite, .357 Magnum revolver is the Smith and Wesson 686 Plus. This is a medium-frame revolver with a three-inch barrel and unfluted seven-shot cylinder. The unfluted cylinder and special grips mark this revolver as a limited edition custom shop handgun. Just the same, Smith and Wesson offers similar revolvers and others of the exact configuration are available, with a little searching. The balance is excellent, even ideal.

Many years ago, the great stunt shooter Ed McGivern had a Smith and Wesson Military and Police revolver cut to 2 7/8 inches and declared it the ideal carry revolver. The three-inch barrel Model 13 .357 Magnum and 3.5-inch barrel Model 27 .357 Magnum are other well-balanced revolvers. The three-inch barrel L frame is the best of the lot in my opinion.

While Smith and Wesson has manufactured great revolvers for a long time, the 686 Plus is superior in many regards. Modern CNC machinery results in tight tolerances in the throat and chamber dimensions. This means excellent accuracy potential, which is important to me for some pursuits. No one has ever been sorry for carrying a very accurate personal defense handgun.

pebble grips on the smith and wesson L frame 686 plus revolver

The author really likes the pebble grips.


The L frame Smith and Wesson is basically a strengthened Smith and Wesson K frame (.38 frame) revolver with greater strength, weight, and a design intended to allow constant use of .357 Magnum revolvers. It is lighter and smaller than the N (.44 frame) frame revolver. The L frame features the same grip frame as the K frame. The modern L frame revolvers all have round butt frames but may be fitted with conversion grips that make the revolver a square butt.

The L frame 686 Plus (Plus means it is a seven-shot version) is well balanced. The unfluted cylinder is a distinctive feature. The heavy, underlugged barrel adds both strength and balance. The revolver features a ramp front sight with an orange insert. This insert is a great aid in sight alignment and has been instrumental in helping many good folks win their battles. The fully-adjustable rear sight is easily adjusted for accurate placement of .38 Special or .357 Magnum loads with bullets from 110 to 200 grains.

The hammer features a wide spur for easy cocking. The trigger is ideal for rapid manipulation in double-action fire. The action is smooth and the trademark action allows staging a shot at longer range. This is simply bringing the hammer back by pressing the trigger, holding the trigger press, and then applying a slight pressure to drop the hammer. This type of shot, with practice, results in excellent accuracy.

The revolver has a different feel than the six-shot Smith and Wesson revolvers. I believe, the different geometry results in a faster action and shorter duration of trigger compression with the seven-shot revolver. This revolver is fitted with a special type of synthetic grips. These grips fit the hand well and keep the hand separated from the steel frame when the revolver fires.

Bob Campbell shooting the smith and wesson 686 plus revolver right

The 686 Plus shows minimal muzzle rise at the moment of firing.

These grips are pebbled lightly to maintain good adhesion. Abrasion is light, however, and this is ideal for such a powerful handgun. A sharply-checkered wood grip would be too raspy for this revolver.

At just over 30 ounces loaded, the 686 is well balanced with plenty of recoil-absorbing weight. I find the seven-shot option appealing. Just the same, when deploying the 686 for personal defense, I keep a pair of SpeedBeez Speedloaders handy—just in case. While the average personal defense incident may entail a few well-placed shots, there is always the man that drowned in a creek of an average three-foot depth. I train for the worst case, not the average, and find these modern and effective speed loaders a comfort.

I tested this handgun with a good number of loads, including my own handloads, and the piece has performed beyond expectation. Using heavy .38 Special loads for practice, the revolver has proven fast on target and accurate on man-sized targets. Once on target, the front sight just hangs there as you press the trigger.

The cadence of fire is set not by how quickly you are able to press the trigger but by how quickly you are able to regain the sights after you fire and recover from recoil. When stepping up to .357 Magnum loads, the revolver remains controllable, but you’ll know you have fired something special. A good load for all-around use in this revolver is the Winchester 125-grain JHP. Breaking 1,335 fps from this three-inch barrel revolver (and 1,400 to 1,420 fps in a four-inch barrel) this loading features a bullet with a good balance of expansion and penetration with penetration of some 18 inches in water. Expansion is excellent.

The 125-grain JHP 1,400 fps load has a good reputation for wound potential. When reduced to 1,300 fps in a short barrel, the 125-grain JHP isn’t substantially downgraded. I have practiced extensively with this loading. Not long ago, while firing at a 100-yard range and testing rifles, I drew the Smith and Wesson 686 Plus and fired at a couple of gallon water jugs at the 100-yard berm. Both were instant hits with a discernible auditory feedback.

Smith and Wesson Model 686 Plus
Caliber .357 Magnum, .38 S&W Special +P
Capacity 7 rounds
Barrel Length 3″ / 7.6 cm
Overall Length 8.2 inches
Front Sight Red Ramp
Rear Sight Adjustable White Outline
Action Single/Double Action
Grip Synthetic
Weight 36.8 oz / 1,043.3g

The .357 Magnum has been called a rifle on the hip. It can indeed be surprisingly accurate, and the power is sufficient to take medium-sized game well past 50 yards. If I anticipate the need for greater penetration, as against the big cats or large feral dogs, I load the Winchester 145-grain Silvertip. This is an overlooked combination and among the finest magnum loads ever produced.

The Smith and Wesson 686 Plus is a great all-around revolver. It is a suitable revolver for personal defense but also well suited to defense against animals. In a pinch, it will get you out of a hairy survival situation by keeping meat on the table or engaging opponents at 100 yards or more. The Smith and Wesson .357 is considerably updated from its introduction in 1935 but remains a marvel.

Do you prefer a six- or seven-shot revolver? Which caliber do you prefer for self-defense? What about barrel length? Share your answers in the comment section.


Bob Campbell is a former peace officer and published author with over 40 years combined shooting and police and security experience. Bob holds a degree in Criminal Justice. Bob is the author of the books, The Handgun in Personal Defense, Holsters for Combat and Concealed Carry, The 1911 Automatic Pistol, The Gun Digest Book of Personal Protection and Home Defense, The Shooter’s Guide to the 1911, The Hunter and the Hunted, and The Complete Illustrated Manual of Handgun Skills. His latest book is Dealing with the Great Ammo Shortage. He is also a regular contributor to Gun Tests, American Gunsmith, Small Arms Review, Gun Digest, Concealed Carry Magazine, Knife World, Women and Guns, Handloader and other publications. Bob is well-known for his firearm testing.

View all articles by Bob Campbell

Tags: , , ,

Trackback from your site.

The mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!'s blog, "The Shooter's Log," is to provide information-not opinions-to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!

Comments (31)

  • Mark


    Just catching up on old e-mail. Wish I’d been more prompt. I was a USPO when the federal courts were still requiring revolver carry. I wasn’t happy with the surplus FBI .357’s being issued and purchased my own duty weapon. Just happened to be that it was one of the original S&W 627 PC’s. As our duty ammunition, the courts issued the Federal LEO only (at that time anyway) Hydra-Shok .38 +P+. With the 8 round (unfluted) cylinder capacity that the (now known as “Bloodwork”) gun provided, I never felt like I was at a disadvantage. 20 years later, I still have that weapon that I carried daily, and I’m NEVER sorry about my decision to purchase, carry, and maintain the weapon. Article brought back some good memories. Thanks!


  • Eric


    I find my S&W 686 Performance Center, my favorite of all the firearms in my inventory. From pistols to rifles, this firearm is tops. One question:
    I tried some left over 38 +P Winchester white box and CORBON SuperAuto +P with with many ‘failures to fire”. The firing pen did not make direct contact, just a small indent. It seems obvious it is the casing is so different it does not sit properly in the cylinder, “too much play/space”. The ammo does not fit into a moon clip, that should tell you all….I see blogs saying it is ok, I say noway, what say you?


  • Tom Roper


    I recently purchased a 686+ in 6 inch barrel length, I prefer this in the backcountry. I like the seven round cylinder and rubberized grip. I knew I was on to something special around 1985 when I purchased the blued steel version 586 – 6 shot Distinguished Combat Magnum in 4 inch, which I still have. Both are very prized firearms. For home defense I have felt a bit more secure with the 8 round capacity of my Springfield Armory M1911 but in the backcountry prefer the accuracy and power of the 586. Now with the 686+ I have the best of both, capacity, accuracy, power, and simplicity of a stainless steel revolver although to be fair, the 1911 has never misfired or jammed.


  • Richard


    When my wife entered the Shreveport Police Academy for Reserve officer training, I loaned her one of my revolvers, a Dan Wesson 357 with the 4″barrel attached while I began shopping for her own gun. At that time wheel guns where still a require carry. I settled on a 686 in Stainless (This was prior to S&W’s foolish decision to quite making the 686). She tried it out and loved it. Her combat range score went from around a 250 or so to a 275 the first night she shot with the 686. The real surprise was when I switched out the small Pachmayr grips I had bought for it with a set of “Lady Pachmayr’s” She shot a 292 out of a 300 that night. She still has the gun and carries it as needed.


  • Grant Howze


    I got a 686 in a trade for an old military rifle (I came out way ahead on that trade I think). Over the years I got to where I count my shots without thinking. When I fired a friends 686 Plus, I kept leaving an un-fired round in it. I do love my 686 though.


  • Hide Behind


    Long a fan of 38 cal. revolvers and appreciate this well written article.
    Long time fan of silvertop ammo in the 120 grain for 357, but there are a lot of more than capable bullet choices today, along with both improved primers and powder.
    I liked a heavier hard cast lead bullet 130 grain in the 5 or longer barreled that I used to pack unconcealed in wilds.
    No laws are going to refrain me from firing first at 35-40 feet shot at a charging bruin, as indeed recoil delays good shot placement.
    While S&W pistols are some of best revolvers ever made, I too this day cannot forgive them for joining into Clinton era Federal gun registration program and their forcing of sellers to do same on all autos or lose their nuying rights,
    So everafter that I would only buy and resell or use as trade material.
    Yes I understand new management, I dislike Rock Island for their last sneaky attempt along same lines as well.
    I get rid of any self defence weapon that is unreliable.
    I have had quality built 100+ year old revolvers that have always gone bang when needed, and yes S%W fit that catagory to the T.


  • Chuck Cochran


    I’ve been toying with the idea of getting another revolver. I have a Model 36 in the venerable old .38, And also an old Interarms Virginia Dragoon SAA in .357. Although I like my auto-loaders, there’s something to be said for a well made revolver.Since it has been re-introduced, I’be been looking at the Model 19’s, but after reading this, I’m going to have to look the 686 over closer. Thanks


  • Michael Chiconsky


    While I completely agree that the 686 is a great revolver, my personal choice is the Ruger GP 100 1771 model. It has the same 7 shot capacity, plus a 4.2″ barrel for longer sight radius. I like the fiber optic front sight for my older eyes although some will no doubt prefer the standard blade. It is well balanced and, as you said in your very well written article, the .357 is a very potent round that gives me confidence in any situation. Thanks for another great article.


    • Bob Campbell


      Thanks for reading! The Ruger is a great revolver and perhaps a bit tougher than the SW.

      Bob Campbell


  • Suddenimpact


    I realize that I am a little late to this conversation but I thought I would still give my input. My first weapon was a S&W Model 65-2, 4 inch, stainless steel revolver, .357 Magnum. To this day I would still say that it was the finest pistol I ever bought. That model is a remake of the S&W Model 19, probably one of the finest models ever made by S&W. It’s a K frame but extremely strong. It is extremely accurate with fixed sights. So accurate that a DEA agent came to me on an investigation involving an acquaintance of mine one day. He told me that the DEA considered me “extremely dangerous” with that revolver because they had followed me one day to an outdoor range.and had spoken with the range master and my uncle (a San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriff).The range master and uncle had told the DEA that yes I was dangerous with that pistol in my hand. I laughed and tried to blow the conversation off. The agent was not happy. Oh well, 23 years later, I am still not in trouble. 😉


  • Harry Lieberman


    I love that firearm!


Leave a comment

Your discussions, feedback and comments are welcome here as long as they are relevant and insightful. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. All comments are held for moderation and will appear after approval.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

%d bloggers like this: