Throwback Thursday—Defensive Ammunition Selection: .223 Rem and 5.56 NATO Rifles

By CTD Mike published on in Ammunition

The rifle has some major advantages over the pistol or shotgun when used as a defensive firearm. The rifle is far more powerful than a pistol and offers a quicker reload than the shotgun. With standard magazines holding 20 or 30 rounds, the rifle offers a capacity advantage as well. As a shoulder-fired firearm, the rifle’s practical accuracy in rapid fire trumps the pistol, and its relative lack of recoil allows for faster follow-up shots than the mighty 12-gauge shotgun. You can fire the rifle more quickly and more accurately than any other defensive choice available.

Stopping Power, Penetration and Liability

However, one big advantage of using a centerfire rifle cartridge for self-defense brings a serious concern along with it. The rifle’s ability to stop bad guys, penetrate barriers, and defeat soft body armor becomes a double-edged sword when considering the legal liability of over-penetration. Fortunately for civilians using the rifle as a defensive arm, a wide variety of ammunition choices are available, especially in the very common .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO calibers. At this point, I should mention these two calibers are NOT the same even though their external dimensions are very similar. Rifles built to withstand the significantly increased chamber pressure of 5.56 NATO can also shoot .223 Remington ammo without difficulty, however, the reverse is not always true. Know your firearm and use the proper ammunition for it.

Likely the worst choice for defensive ammo is the inexpensive Russian-made, steel-cased full-metal jacket rounds that we have all used for practice at one time or another. It’s affordable, and I have converted thousands of rounds of it into smoke and noise over the years. However, its full metal jacket bullet is a simple pointed nose design with a thick copper jacket around its lead core; it will not expand or fragment when it hits the muscle and bone of the bad guy. These bullets tend to travel straight through whatever they hit and keep going for quite a distance before eventually tumbling. Remember, if the bad guy dies from blood loss in a hospital hours later, it doesn’t matter—we are shooting to stop his aggression right now! This ammo offers minimal stopping power combined with maximum legal risk. We must plan being legally liable for everything struck by the bullets we fire. A bullet that drills a .223 caliber hole straight through the bad guy before blowing through the wall behind him is the worst combination possible.

Military spec ammo combined with chopped barrels hurt stopping power in Mogadishu

The M193 Round

A slightly better option, while still being crippled by the full metal jacket bullet design, is the 5.56 NATO military specification M193 round. The 55-grain bullet is similar in outward appearance to other FMJ rounds, but features a thinner copper jacket around the lead core. When the bullet hits with sufficient velocity (greater than 2,600 feet per second or so), the extreme pressure of striking the target is sometimes too much for the thin jacketing to keep the bullet together. If the jacketing breaks at the cannelure, the groove around the bullet where the casing crimps to hold it, the bullet will fragment into several smaller chunks which spread out in all directions. They are unlikely to pass all the way through the bad guy’s body with enough force to do damage to anything else behind him. A 5.56 NATO round which fragments inside the chest cavity of a bad guy is very likely to stop him right there. Unfortunately, the fragmentation of the M193 round is not a consistent sure thing at all; even under strict testing conditions, only a certain percentage of rounds will do it. There is no evidence that the military wanted a fragmenting bullet design or was even aware that it could fragment when they adopted the M193 bullet way back in 1964. The fact that it does sometimes fragment is really an accident of bullet construction techniques rather than the feature for which it is now known.

The M855 Round

The other military specification round, the 62 grain M855 (USA) or SS109 (NATO) loading, can also fragment like the M193, but it doesn’t fragment as often or as violently.  The bullet design of the M855 is complicated, featuring full metal jacketing over the pointed lead bullet and a steel penetrator core at the bottom. It is slightly heavier than the M193 but offers less velocity. Designed in the 1970s specifically to penetrate one side of a Soviet steel helmet from a distance of 600 meters. seemed like a great idea at the time. In the real world, M855 has had some disappointing results. In the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu (Blackhawk Down), Delta Force soldiers reported frustration with shooting enemies multiple times only to see them get up and run away. The combination of their short-barreled (10.5-11.5 inch) CAR-15 type rifles and M855 ammunition did not produce enough velocity for the bullets to fragment; they traveled straight through the Somali fighters.

Today’s Bullet Technology

In recent years, bullet technology has grown tremendously. The old soft tip hunting ammo designs have been overtaken by hollow points offering expansion along with good weight retention.  These rounds form a mushroom shape limiting over penetration and devastating soft tissue, while holding the bullet together instead of fragmenting. Most recently, ammo makers have started capping their hollow points with a plastic ballistic tip. When the bullet strikes the target, the plastic tip drives backwards inside the hollow of the bullet, helping the bullet expand reliably and more consistently. Ballistic tip ammunition offers a good mix of penetration combined with reliable expansion and weight retention. Though sold for years as hunting ammunition, manufacturers have also begun to offer ballistic tip loadings specifically for law enforcement or personal defense. For most common defensive applications, this is the pinnacle of bullet technology at this time.

Inexpensive steel cased ammo intended for plinking and training is a poor choice for use when lives are on the line. Military specification loadings are better, but their performance is inconsistent compared to the latest generation of ballistic tip hollow points. When loading a rifle for defending your life, choose your ammunition carefully.

Hornady’s TAP FPD “For Personal Defense” loading uses state of the art ballistic tip bullets

What is your favorite defensive rifle load? Tell us in the comment section.

This article originally appeared on September 13, 2011.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Trackback from your site.

The mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!'s blog, "The Shooter's Log," is to provide information-not opinions-to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!

Comments (15)

  • Fresnel


    James: Given those two choices, I too would agree with you; better to get the job done and roll the dice for that small chance of injuring a civilian than not get the job done and potentially get injured yourself. In the test I mentioned earlier, the safest round tested was .223 A-Max, which put a massive hole through the back of the first wall and failed to reach the second wall at all, but its terminal ballistics and overall penetration are abysmal. I wouldn’t feel underpowered with a JSP though… after all, they ARE rated for black bears. I think if it can take a bear, it can take a man. Maybe not in a single, mediocrely-placed shot, but that’s why ARs have 30-round magazines where shotguns have seven. And the first hit will certainly pause the fight and allow you to place a better one the second time.

    On the more materialistic side, reduced penetration through walls makes it less likely you’ll put a bullet across the house and through your multi-thousand-dollar flatscreen, or into the garage and through your car door or something.


  • Big John


    Golly guys! Why not just get a Doberman Magnum, I think any consideration of ‘overbite’ will pale in comparison to overpenetration. Besides, overbite by your DM is more precisely what is wanted and while that alrm is sounding you’ll have time to grab your weapon of choice AND dial 911.

    Hope you can appreciate the tongue in cheek!


    • Real Skinny, The


      you can get the FNH-USA 5.7x28mm upper-receiver, for your AR-15/M4 lower-receiver and solve that problem.


  • Steve K


    The M193 round is an excellent choice, provided that you use it in the weapon that it was designed for. When used in an AR with a 1/12 barrel twist such as the M16A1, it will expand and fragment reliably. When used in a 1/7 or 1/9 twist barrel it will not work as well. I own several AR’s and the one that is my go to gun for home defense is an A1 clone. The M193 round fired from this rifle is superior to an M855 round fired from a A2 or M4. Plus the M193 is generally cheaper than M855 rounds.


Leave a comment

Your discussions, feedback and comments are welcome here as long as they are relevant and insightful. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. All comments are held for moderation and will appear after approval.

six + = 9