“Amazing penetration and striking power!”

By olegv published on in Ammunition

This marketing slogan of the early 1900s described pistols chambered in the lowly .32 ACP cartridge. The guns were touted as being good for everything from home defense to assassinating important persons to self-defense against brown bear. To the modern reader, such claims appear outrageous, but why were they taken seriously back then? The rounds that 32ACP superseded were mainly the black powder .320 revolver cartridges loaded with lead round nose bullets. 80 grain unjacketed bullet at about 550fps lacked penetration and typically did not expand. Five or six of those from a revolver were rather less likely to end a fight than eight jacketed pistol bullets propelled by smokeless powder at 900fps. Neither round would equal the performance of .38 Automatic or similar, but then neither would the larger guns fit pockets, whereas the .32 could. Note that neither the higher velocity nor the greater penetration were at all significant for target shooting, so the Olympic pistols use .32 S&W Long even today.

1908 Steyr-Pieper .32 tip-barrel pistol

1908 Steyr-Pieper .32 tip-barrel pistol

22LR ball, 22WMR ball, hollow point and varmint rounds

22LR ball, 22WMR ball, hollow point and varmint rounds

Much the same situation obtains with 22LR and 22WMR. The ballistic advantages of the higher velocity round are meaningless for target shooting and recreation plinking, while the lower cost of the 22LR makes it quite attractive. On the other hand, people who shoot things other than paper may find 22WMR worth considering. First, let’s look at the bullet construction. 22LR bullets are usually plain or plated lead, with a couple of pre-fragmented rounds available. 22WMR, on the other hand, comes in plain lead for plinking, as ball for penetration (capable of defeating the skull of a 300-pound wild boar straight on), hollow point for self-defense and frangible for varminting. Next comes the velocity difference. Although 22WMR appears to be a waste for use in pistols due to the slow powders used, it still gives the same performance from a pistol as 22LR out of a rifle. Out of the rifle, the faster cartridge pushes 1950fps with 40 grain bullets and at 200 yards (!) the velocity is the same that 22LR produces at the muzzle. That becomes significant both for resisting wind drift and for minimizing projectile drop. In sum, just the 32ACP in the early 1900s, 22WRM provides a valuable improvement in performance over 22LR without adding much weight or bulk.

RMR30 with Primary Arms 3x prismatic scope, Gemtech 22WMR sound suppressor

RMR30 with Primary Arms 3x prismatic scope, Gemtech 22WMR sound suppressor

22WMR is obviously a marginal round for self-defense but it is far from useless. Its niche is similar to the 5.7×28 FN cartridges, for use in lightweight compact weapons. For example, the upcoming Keltec RMR30 is almost exactly half the weight of an AR15 with the same length barrel. If necessary, it may be fired with one hand. Each extra loaded magazine adds 6.4oz vs. 16oz for the standard AR15. This may be of small importance to professional weapon users, but paramount to backpackers or to those who cannot lift much weight due to a handicap. RMR30 itself is not designed as a front-line combat weapon. For example, the telescoping stock is lightly built and wouldn’t last in melee fighting, but then neither would the folding stock of the “paratrooper” M1A1 carbine. As configured, it proved 100% reliable over hundreds of rounds and quite accurate as well: at 25 yards, I can put the entire 30 round magazine into one 1/2″ hole using the 3x scope and CCI Maxi-Mag ammunition. That’s with my elbows rested on a table, not from a machine rest. The crisp trigger shared by RMR30 and PMR30 is a big help with the accuracy. The imperceptible recoil helps as well. When I take it to the range, I always end up with 10-11 year old kids wanting to try it — the light weight and the variable length stock make it a viable firearm for them. The sound suppressor works quite efficiently because the amount of gas at the muzzle of a 22WMR isn’t large but it exits at a fairly high pressure. The illuminated 3x scope works well for precision shooting — for defensive use, a red dot allowing co-witnessed backup sights would be more appropriate.

Tags: , , ,

Trackback from your site.

The mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!'s blog, "The Shooter's Log," is to provide information-not opinions-to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!

Comments (6)

  • Jenni

    |

    If you wish for to obtaіn a great dеal from this piеcе of writing
    then yоu have to apply these tеchniquеs to your won
    wеblog.

    Reply

  • igor

    |

    the 22 mag round are just about the same cost here as 9mm

    but the difference in performance is huge

    Reply

  • olegv

    |

    “I’ve owned .22 WMR pistols” — 22wmr in pistols isn’t that impressive. Neither is the 30gr Stinger out of the short barrels. That’s why the rifle variant is shown — the difference in velocity is considerable (1250fps vs. 1950fps for the same 40gr bullet)

    Reply

  • David

    |

    I respectfully disagree with the opinion expressed in the article. I’ve owned .22 WMR pistols and wasn’t impressed with the round at all. I’ve got a S&W M&P 15-22 rifle [as well as bolt action .22LR’s] and I’d much rather have it..loaded with ‘cheap to shoot’ CCI Stingers [1,640FPS @ the muzzle / 1,282 FPS @ 50yards] than the more expensive .22WMR. Now, in a bolt action rifle shooting Praire Dogs & small varmints at long ranges.. I’d go with the .17 HMR caliber shooting the plastic ballistic tipped bullets that virtually explode upon impact.

    For shots under 50 yrds.. when hunting small game and especially for home defense where shots would usually be under 30 feet…my M&P 15-22 rifle can dump 25+1 hard hitting rounds just as fast as I can pull the trigger..and I can put them all in a hole the size of a 25-cent piece if I steady myself against a door sill or on a table or other object used as a rest. I can easily hit the bottom of a shotgun shell hull at 50 feet. 25 rounds of .22LR CCI Stingers rapid fired under 30 feet @ 1,600 FPS is better than a couple of rounds of OO buckshot fired from a .410, 20 or 12 gauge shotgun @1,250 FPS… as far as I’m concerned.

    Reply

  • Sigivald

    |

    22LR bullets are usually plain or plated lead, with a couple of pre-fragmented rounds available. 22WMR, on the other hand, comes in plain lead for plinking, as ball for penetration (capable of defeating the skull of a 300-pound wild boar straight on), hollow point for self-defense and frangible for varminting.

    Well, it’s not like 22LR hollow-points are rare as hen’s teeth… 1/3 of the entries on the first page of 22LR ammunition here on CTD’s own catalog are hollow point.

    I don’t know if the implication that 22LRs are rarely/never hollow-points was intentional, but that’s how I read it.

    (The power difference is of course entirely real and significant.)

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your discussions, feedback and comments are welcome here as long as they are relevant and insightful. Please be respectful of others. We reserve the right to edit as appropriate, delete profane, harassing, abusive and spam comments or posts, and block repeat offenders. All comments are held for moderation and will appear after approval.


9 + = twelve